Allowed

Chandrama @ Surya Pratap v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 Jun 2020BAIL/13957/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal bail application, the Court granted bail to the applicant by analogy with a co-accused who was already on bail, imposing standard conditions including cooperation in trial and non-interference with witnesses.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties upon the restoration of normal court functioning.

Chandrama @ Surya Pratap Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 70

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13957 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Chandrama @ Surya Pratap Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Gautam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

¶6

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Chandrama @ Surya Pratap, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 363 of 2019, under Sections 323/34, 147, 325, 304, 308, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Baragaon, District Varanasi , during pendency of trial.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the co-accused, Bal Lakhandar, has been granted bail by this Court on 23.1.2020 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.2516 of 2020. The case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is languishing in jail since 11.7.2019.

¶8

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail, but does not dispute the claim of parity.

¶9

Let the applicant involved in aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶10

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶11

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶12

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶13

In case the applicant has been enlarged on short term bail as per the order of committee constituted under the orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court his bail shall be effective after the period of short term bail comes to an end.

¶14

The applicant shall be enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond without sureties till normal functioning of the courts is restored. The accused will furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the court below within a month after normal functioning of the courts are restored.

¶15

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶16

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶17

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶18

Order Date :- 17.6.2020 Ruchi Agrahari

Chandrama @ Surya Pratap v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrama @ Surya Pratap v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ayaz Vs State of U.P.

Manish Chaudhary Vs State of U.P.

Preetam Singh Vs State of U.P.

Ayodhya Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Munshi Lal Vs State of U.P.

irshad Vs State of U.P.