Pradeep Sharma Vs State of U.P.

Court No. - 76

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11832 of 2020

Applicant :- Pradeep Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

This bail application is being disposed of as per the order dated 19.7.2020 of Hon'ble the Chief Justice through Video Conferencing.

¶6

In view of the guidelines laid down by this Court, the urgent bail applications have been directed to be heard through Video Conferencing.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. through Video Conferencing.

¶8

It is submitted that there are general allegations against all the accused persons.The First Information Report has been lodged on the basis of information received by the informant from the third person.In the statement of independent witness, applicant has been assigned the role of catching hold.Applicant alleges false implication in this case.The applicant is in jail since 28.9.2019 and has no criminal history.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid fact..

¶10

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, argument advanced on behalf of the parties, spreading of novel corona virus in jails, evidence on record regarding complicity of the accused, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018)3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant, Pradeep Sharma, who is involved in Case Crime No. 570 of 2019, under

¶12

Sections 147, 302 I.P.C, Police Station-Bannadevi , District- Aligarh, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶13

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶14

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶15

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶16

In case the applicant has been enlarged on short term bail as per the order of committee constituted under the orders of Hon'ble Supreme Court his bail shall be effective after the period of short term bail comes to an end.

¶17

The applicant shall be enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond without sureties till normal functioning of the courts is restored. The accused will furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the court below within a month after normal functioning of the courts are restored.

¶18

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶19

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶20

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶21

Order Date :- 22.7.2020 Atul kr. sri.

Pradeep Sharma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradeep Sharma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Vs State of U.P.

Vijay Verma @ Natu Vs State of U.P. and Another

Irshad Vs State of U.P.

Hasmuddin @ Hasmukh Vs State of U.P.

Mukesh Yadav and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Dilawar Vs State of U.P.