Allowed

Parvez v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC9 Dec 2020ABAIL/8906/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court allowed an Anticipatory Bail application filed by Parvez in a theft case involving a recovered motorcycle. The court granted bail for a limited period pending the police report under Section 173 Cr.P.C., subject to conditions, and directed the Investigating Officer to conclude the investigation independently.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted for a limited period on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each, subject to specified conditions.

Parvez Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 70

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8906 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Parvez Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Amir Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA. Perused the material on record.

¶6

Order on Criminal Misc. Exemption Application

¶7

This exemption application is allowed.

¶8

Order on Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application

¶9

The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant an anticipatory bail to the applicant, namely, Parvez, in Case Crime No. 1092 of 2017, under Section 379 I.P.C , Police Station - Kotwali Dehat, District - Bulandshahr.

¶10

Prior notice of this bail application was served in the office of Government Advocate and as per Chapter XVIII, Rule 18 of the Allahabad High Court Rules and as per direction dated 20.11.2020 of this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No. 8072 of 2020, Govind Mishra @ Chhotu Versus State of U.P., hence, this anticipatory bail application is being heard. Grant of further time to the learned A.G.A. as per Section 438 (3) Cr.P.C. (U. P. Amendment) is not required.

¶11

First information report was lodged against unknown accused persons regarding theft of a motor cycle.

¶12

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that after three years motorcycle has been recovered from coaccused, Sajid. There is no public witness of recovery. Applicant has been falsely implicated. He has no criminal history to his credit.

¶13

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail

¶14

of the applicant.

¶15

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the nature of accusation and his antecedents, the applicant is entitled to be released on anticipatory bail for limited period in this case considering the exceptions considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sus hila Aggarwal vs. State (NCT of Delhi)- 2020 SCC Online SC 98 and order dated 22.05.2020 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No.2609 of 2020.

¶16

In the event of arrest of the applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report, if any, under section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. before the competent Court on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-

¶17

(i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police office as and when required;

¶18

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police office;

¶19

(iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.

¶20

(iv) The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶21

(v) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶22

In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶23

The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law,

¶24

expeditiously, independently without being prejudiced by any observations made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant.

¶25

The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.

¶26

Order Date :- 9.12.2020 SS

Parvez v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parvez v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mujibuddin Vs State of U.P.

Mintu Vs State of U.P.

Sunil Kumar Vs State of Up and Another

Jeetu Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sujeet Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Mahesh Vs State of U.P.