Mintu v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge of Allahabad High Court granted bail to the applicant in a Gangster Act case, ordering release on personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions regarding non-tampering, cooperation, and court functioning.
What did the court decide?
Released on bail with personal bond and two sureties subject to specific conditions regarding conduct and court functioning.
What the court decided
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44402 of 2020
Applicant :- Mintu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Pathak,Harshit Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Mintu, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 517 of 2020, under Sections 2/3 U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Fatehpur, District- Saharanpur, during pendency of trial.
According to the gang chart the applicant is said to have been involved in one criminal case in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. The applicant alleges false implication in the present case due to police rivalry. He is languishing in jail since 14.10.2020.
Having considered the material on record, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be released on bail pending trial in a case under U.P. Gangster Act
Whether bail conditions should consider the restoration of normal court functioning
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mintu
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/44402/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court