The Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court refused anticipatory bail to the applicant in a case involving Sections 307 and 323 IPC. The court held there were no grounds for bail due to injuries inflicted on vital parts.
Anticipatory bail application is refused and rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 67 of 2020
Applicant :- Hari Mohan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dharm Vir Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Nafees Ahmad the learned A.G.A. for the State, Sri Vipin Kumar who appears for the informant and perused the record.
The instant application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in light of the apprehension of the arrest of the applicant in Case Crime No. 413 of 2019, under Sections 307, 323 I.P.C. police station Jalesar, District Etah.
The Court finds no ground to accord the facility of anticipatory bail to the applicant bearing in mind the nature of injuries which were inflicted on vital parts. The prayer so made is refused.
The application consequently stands rejected .
Order Date :- 18.1.2020 faraz
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted given the nature of injuries inflicted on vital parts.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hari Mohan
State of U.P.
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
