Tarik v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
An anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC was rejected. The court noted the applicant's serious criminal history, including an offence under Section 307 IPC, finding no ground for granting such relief.
What did the court decide?
Application sought for anticipatory bail is rejected.
What the court decided
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 689 of 2020
Applicant :- Tarik Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shabana Nizam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri I.P. Srivastava, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The instant application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in light of the apprehension of the arrest of the applicant in Case Crime No. 279 of 2019, under Sections 34/307, 336 IPC, Section 3/5A/8 of the Uttar Pradesh Cow Slaughter (Prevention)Act 1955 and Section 11 of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960., police station Pholpur, District Azamgarh.
Bearing in mind the criminal history of the applicant which stands duly disclosed and which includes commission of serious offences including Section 307 IPC, the Court finds no ground to accord the facility of anticipatory bail to the applicant. The prayer so made is refused.
The application consequently stands rejected .
Order Date :- 17.1.2020 faraz
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted given the applicant's criminal history.
Whether the applicant is entitled to the facility of bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Tarik
Coram
Yashwant Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/689/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court