The Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application. Despite some incongruities in the victim's statement alleging inconsistent versions of the offence, the nature of the alleged offences led the Court to decline the grant of anticipatory bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5358 of 2020
Applicant :- Lalla Alias Sirtaj Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ravindra Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 22.10.2020 Atul
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the discretionary jurisdiction should be exercised to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 452, 323, 506, 354 IPC.
Lalla Alias Sirtaj
State of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
