The High Court rejected an anticipatory bail application filed by Kallu @ Dhanmantri in a case involving Sections 323 and 307 IPC. The court declined to grant bail due to the serious nature of the firearm injury allegation, distinguishing it from cases involving co-accused already granted bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2566 of 2020 Applicant :- Kallu @ Dhanmantri Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 10.6.2020 Prakhar
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to an accused alleged with causing firearm injury where co-accused already enlarged on similar charges
Whether the injury report prepared by private establishment is manufactured or real
Kallu @ Dhanmantri
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
