The Court declined an anticipatory bail application filed by Israr in a case involving dowry and cruelty allegations. The application was disposed of without interference, with the applicant's future regular bail request remaining open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2560 of 2020
Applicant :- Israr Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajendra Prasad,Vinod Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 10.6.2020 Prakhar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant falsely implicated in a domestic violence and dowry harassment case pending trial.
Israr
State of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
