Savita Devi and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC after registration of a criminal case in 2017. The single-judge bench rejected the application, holding that the petitioner failed to establish any foundation for the apprehension of arrest despite the delay.
What did the court decide?
The anticipatory bail application was refused and rejected. The applicant is not precluded from taking other legal proceedings.