Ravi Saini and 3 Others v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application as infructuous though no reasons were given.
Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application as infructuous though no reasons were given.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 81
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2331 of 2020
Applicant :- Ravi Saini And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Deep Chandra Joshi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Learned counsel for the applicants states that the instant application has been rendered infructuous and it may be dismissed as such.
Order accordingly.
Order Date :- 5.10.2020 Vivek Kr.
Ravi Saini And 3 Others
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court