Rajendra Gupta v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
An application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed in 2005 was dismissed as infructuous by the High Court, citing no appearance and efflux of time.
An application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed in 2005 was dismissed as infructuous by the High Court, citing no appearance and efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9922 of 2005
Applicant :- Rajendra Gupta Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Singhal Counsel for Opposite Party :- Government Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 17.1.2020 KA
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajendra Gupta
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court