The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed in revise in the absence of the petitioner's counsel. The Court ruled the matter was infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36834 of 1995
Petitioner :- Kullu And Another Respondent :- The Chief Revenue Oficer And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- R.C.Singh,Ramgee Prasad,Sushil Kumar Srivastava,Virendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,R.K.Yadav,R.S.Dwivedi
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 14.1.2020 Manish Himwan
Kullu And Another
The Chief Revenue Oficer And Another
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
