High Court refused to immediately quash the non-bailable warrant in a 482 Cr.P.C. application involving fabricated allegations, but kept the warrant in abeyance for 30 days while considering bail if the applicant surrenders.
Non-bailable warrant kept in abeyance for 30 days; if applicant surrenders, bail prayer shall be considered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 76
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 791 of 2020
Applicant :- Manoj Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Garun Pal Singh,Amit Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
The contention of learned counsel for the applicants is that no offence against the applicant is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purpose of causing harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention.
in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC ).
(Manju Rani Chauhan, J.)
Order Date :- 9.1.2020
Sushil/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 482 Cr.P.C. application to quash non-bailable warrant warrants immediate order in absence of cogent submission.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P.Relied on¶10
Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. 2004 (57) ALR 290
Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.Relied on¶10
Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manoj
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
