Smt. Rinku Maurya and Others v. State of U.P.and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Section 482 Cr.P.C. application dismissed for want of prosecution (non-appearance of applicant's counsel); interim order vacated; lower-court proceedings directed to continue; State of U.P. represented through Government Advocate/A.G.A.; purely procedural order with no merits determination, no cited precedents and no quantum; citable only as an instance of dismissal for default of prosecution.
What did the court decide?
The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution, none having appeared for the applicants despite repeated calls and no adjournment having been requested. ¶9