Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the applicant despite repeated calls, with interim orders vacated.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11221 of 2011
Applicant :- Smt.Vimlawati Devi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate,B.K.Ojha
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Cause list has been revised.
None appears on behalf of the applicant inspite of repeated calls.
There is no request for adjournment on behalf of the applicant.
Shri B.K. Ojha, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of this order be sent to the court concerned so that the case pending before the court below may proceed further in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 2.1.2020
Sanjeet
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Vimlawati Devi
State Of U.P.
Om Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
