In this application under Section 482 CrPC, the court disposed of the matter by dismissing it for want of prosecution. The applicant failed to appear despite repeated calls, and no request for adjournment was made.
Application under Section 482 CrPC dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11263 of 2011
Applicant :- Sujeet Kumar And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate,Imran Syed
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Cause list has been revised.
None appears on behalf of the applicants inspite of repeated calls.
There is no request for adjournment on behalf of the applicants.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of this order be sent to the court concerned so that the case pending before the court below may proceed further in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 2.1.2020
Sanjeet
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. should be considered in absence of applicant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sujeet Kumar
Another
State Of U.P.
Another
Om Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
