Petitioner in writ petition removed offending machinery from premises. Court held cause of action abated. Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 83
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2983 of 2020 Petitioner :- Jony Saini Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Aditya Prasad Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Anwar Hussain
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Heard Sri Aditya Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anwar Hussain, learned counsel for the respondents.
Sri Anwar Hussain, learned counsel for the respondents on the basis of instructions submits that the petitioner has removed the offending machinery from the residential premises. The written instructions are taken on reocrd.
Sri Aditya Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner upon instructions from the respondents also agrees with the aforesaid submission.
In view of the fact that the petitioner has removed the offending machinery voluntarily, the cause on which the petition was founded does not survive.
The petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 17.12.2020 Pravin
Jony Saini
State of U.P.
Another
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
