In this matter under Article 227, the petitioner sought a direction for the Civil Judge to decide a pending 6C application. The judge noted no appearance and found no grounds for interference, dismissing the petition as devoid of merit.
The petition was dismissed as devoid of merit with no direction issued for expedited disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 80
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2386 of 2020
Petitioner :- Rajnath Tiwari Respondent :- Jagdish Tiwari Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Keshari,Randhir Jain
Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
List has been revised. No one appears to press this petition.
This petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"I. direct the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hawali, District Varanasi to decide the 6C application of plaintiff/petitioner filed on 23.01.2020 in case Civil Suit No. 106 of 2020 (Rajnath Tiwari Vs. Jagdish Tiwari), pending before him within stipulated period."
I have perused the petition along with the annexures and find no good ground for interfere in the matter.
This petition is devoid of merit and it is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 7.8.2020 A. V. Singh
(Jayant Banerji, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there are good grounds for interfering with the lower court's order in a writ petition under Article 226/227.
Whether the High Court should direct the Civil Judge to decide a pending application within a stipulated period.
Rajnath Tiwari
Jagdish Tiwari
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
