The writ petition filed by M/S Nitco Logistics Pvt. Ltd. was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner admitted that the goods in question had already been released by the respondent.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 94 of 2019
Petitioner :- M/S Nitco Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nishant Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Sri Nishant Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned Special Counsel for the State.
Learned Special Counsel contends that the goods have already been released in this matter. Learned Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute this fact.
In view of the above, this writ petition has become infructuous.
It is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 27.2.2019 S.P.
M/S Nitco Logistics Pvt. Ltd.
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
