Dismissed
M/S Growmax Machinery v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Allahabad HCWTAX/92/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 92 of 2019 Petitioner…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 92 of 2019 Petitioner…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 92 of 2019
Petitioner :- M/S Growmax Machinery Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suyash Agarwal,Ankur Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Sri Suyash Agrawal, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned Special Counsel for the State.
Learned Special Counsel contends that the goods have already been released in this matter. Learned Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute this fact.
In view of the above, this writ petition has become infructuous.
It is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 27.2.2019 S.P.
M/S Growmax Machinery
State Of U.P.
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court