A single judge Bench dismissed this writ petition observed that the matter was already concluded by a Division Bench in Writ-C No.25730 of 2017 resulting in the matter being decided in the same terms.
The writ petition was dismissed based on the earlier decision in Writ-C No.25730 of 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 903 of 2018
Petitioner :- M/S Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suyash Agarwal,Ajay Tandon Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Shri Suyash Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
This matter has already been concluded by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ-C No.25730 of 2017 (Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vs. State of U.P. & Others) decided on 04.05.2018.
This matter is also decided in the same terms as of Writ-C No. 25730 of 2017.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 11.2.2019 pks
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vs. State of U.P. & OthersFollowed¶7
Writ-C No.25730 of 2017 (Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vs. State of U.P. & Others)
M/S Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited
State Of U.P.
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
