M/S A.N. Steels India v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 4 of 2019 Petitioner…
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 4 of 2019 Petitioner…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 4 of 2019
Petitioner :- M/S A.N. Steels India Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Praveen Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Shri Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Shri Nimai Dass, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the goods have been released and the matter has now become infructuous by efflux of time.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 8.2.2019 pks
M/S A.N. Steels India
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court