The High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner stated the goods had been released and the time limit had elapsed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 237 of 2019
Petitioner :- M/S Maa Bhawani Traders Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aditya Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Shri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Shri B.P. Singh Kachhawah, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the goods have been released and the matter has now become infructuous by efflux of time.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 27.3.2019 pks
M/S Maa Bhawani Traders
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
