The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by a complainant, Hari Ram Maurya, noting that lawful remedies remain available. The court declined to interfere at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 346 of 2019
Petitioner :- Hari Ram Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kundan Kumar,Rakhi Kumari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Shri Kundan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Shri B.P. Singh Kachhawah, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
The petitioner is a complainant. It is open to him to take recourse to the remedies which are available under the law. We are not inclined to interfere in the matter at this stage.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 26.3.2019 pks
Hari Ram Maurya
State Of U.P.
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
