M/S Kei Industries Ltd. v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court finally disposed of the writ petition by relying on its own earlier judgment in Writ Tax No. 587 of 2018. It admitted that goods transported by the petitioner were not covered by E-way bill requirements during the specified period and set aside the impugned tax demand accordingly.
What did the court decide?
The impugned tax demand was set aside and the writ petition was allowed.