In a revisional writ petition, the two-judge bench of the High Court perused the record without the petitioner appearing. The court rejected the petitioner's claim that guidelines prohibit opening new outlets near his petroleum station, holding that guidelines do not obstruct such authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6572 of 2019
Petitioner :- Gurbaj Singh Kang Respondent :- Union Of India And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Anand Tiwari, R.K. Jaiswal
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 28.2.2019 PS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's grievance regarding the opening of new retail outlets near his petroleum outlet has merit.
Whether the Government of India guidelines on retail outlets obstruct authorities from opening outlets.
Gurbaj Singh Kang
Union Of India
2 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
