Petitioner challenged a cancellation order and blacklisting as a non-speaking order. The court held the contracting authority need not pass a judgment in such mat ters and dismissed the writ petition.
Writ petition dismissed. No relief granted in favour of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3503 of 2019
Petitioner :- M/S V. Tel Power And Communication And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Vinod Kumar Sahu
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 28.2.2019 Siddhant Sahu
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S V. Tel Power And Communication
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
