Case called out for hearing; petitioner absent, only respondent counsel present; petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order discharged.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 64892 of 2009
Petitioner :- Ram Nath Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kr. Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Soumel Srivastava
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
Learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents is present.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 21.10.2019 Atmesh
(Ajit Kumar,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
Ram Nath Singh
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
