The writ petition was dismissed for lack of prosecution as the petitioner was absent from the hearing on the record date.
Dismissal of the writ petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 61156 of 2012
Petitioner :- Mahaveer Joot Mill Shiv Shakti Sharmik Sangh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Manish Kumar Nigam,C.B. Dhar Dubey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,V.R.Agarwal,Vinod Swaroop
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
List has been revised.
No one is present for the petitioner. Sri Vinod Swaroop, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 is present.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 1.8.2019 Md Faisal
(Dr. Y. K. Srivastava,J.)
Mahaveer Joot Mill Shiv Shakti Sharmik Sangh
State Of U.P.
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
