The High Court Bench dismissed the writ petition seeking eviction of alleged illegal encroachers from disputed Gaon Sabha land. The Court held that the petitioner had alternative remedies available under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2005, Zamindari Abolition Act, and CrPC Section 133.
Writ petition dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5518 of 2019
Petitioner :- Padohi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Mishra,Chandra Prakash Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 18.2.2019 Nirmal
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition for eviction alleging illegal encroachment should be entertained when alternative remedies exist.
Padohi
State Of U.P.
Private Respondents
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
