This judgment dismisses a writ petition seeking protection for a witness in a pending corruption trial. The Court held that the petitioner's grievance regarding threats should be addressed by filing an application before the competent trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5439 of 2019
Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U P And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Babu Lal Ram Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 15.2.2019 Akram
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a witness facing threats in a pending trial can approach this Court for protection instead of moving the trial court.
Sunil Kumar Tripathi
State Of U P
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
