The court dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petition sought an injunction against private respondents regarding tree cutting. The court held it to be essentially a civil suit under Section 9 CPC and dismissed it based on the availability of alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5515 of 2019
Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prakhar Tandon Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 15.2.2019 Manoj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition for injunction is maintainable when civil law remedy exists.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Raj Kumar
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
