This writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking restraint from interference in property possession was dismissed as the effective relief sought was an injunction for which an alternative common law suit remedy was available.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5389 of 2019
Petitioner :- Sri Lala And 17 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Tariq Naiyer,Himanshu Kumar,Sri Zafar Naiyer(Senior Advocate) Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 15.2.2019 I.A.Siddiqui
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking restraint from interference in peaceful possession, which is effectively a suit for injunction, can be maintained when an alternative legal remedy exists.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Lala And 17 Others
State Of U.P. And 10 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
