The High Court dismissed this writ petition for want of prosecution after the petitioner's counsel stated lack of instructions due to non-response by the client. An interim order, if any, was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 52117 of 2008
Petitioner :- Zakir Rana Respondent :- M.D. P.V.V.N.L. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- B.C. Rai,Dinesh Rai Counsel for Respondent :- H.P. Dube,N.Misra.,S.C.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Sri Dinesh Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instructions in the matter as his client is not responding
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution .
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 6.8.2019
Sanjeev
(Ajit Kumar,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
Zakir Rana
M.D. P.V.V.N.L.
Another
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
