The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking quashing of a recovery citation and certificate under Article 226/227. The Court held that since the petitioner had already availed the statutory alternative remedy of revision, it was ill-advised to interfere.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4926 of 2019
Petitioner :- M/S Sharad Enterprises Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 13.2.2019 KA
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition for quashing a recovery citation and certificate filed despite availing statutory alternative remedy can be entertained.
Whether deliberate and unreasonable delay exists on the part of the Revisional Authority to justify issuance of writ of mandamus.
M/S Sharad Enterprises
State Of U P
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
