The Single Judge's Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of alternative remedy, as the petitioner had a statutory right of appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
Petitioner given liberty to avail remedy of appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4267 of 2019
Petitioner :- Ravindra Nath Chaubey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anant Ram Dube Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 13.2.2019 AK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition in a workmen's compensation matter lies after the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
Ravindra Nath Chaubey
State Of U.P.
4 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
