In a writ petition calling for revision where no petitioner appeared and Learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent State was present, the court held that the cause of action may no longer survive or the matter is infructuous. The petition was accordingly dismissed with interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 44447 of 2006
Petitioner :- Smt. Sudha Dwivedi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,S.P.K. Tripathi
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 25.9.2019 Siddhant Sahu
Smt. Sudha Dwivedi
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
