The High Court disposed of this writ petition, directing the competent authority to decide the petitioner's representation regarding the stoppage of his pension and pass an appropriate order within two months.
Direction to respondent/competent authority to decide petitioner's representation and pass appropriate order within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 30853 of 2019
Petitioner :- Sachendra Kumar Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Mohan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
3.Learned Standing Counsel submits that in case no final decision has been taken on the representation of petitioner, the same shall be decided expeditiously.
Order Date :- 24.9.2019 YK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's pending representation regarding the stoppage of pension should be decided expeditiously.
Sachendra Kumar Gupta
State Of U.P.
District Magistrate, Etah
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
