Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of petitioner when no one appeared to press the case.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 43728 of 2014
Petitioner :- Maidan Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K. Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,R.K. Yadav
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
List has been revised. No one appears for the petitioner to press this writ petition. Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel appears for the respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Rajesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 4 is also present.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 21.8.2019 Pratima
(Dr.Y.K.Srivastava,J.)
Maidan Singh
State Of U.P.
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
