Petitioner withdrew the writ petition intending to approach the relevant authority for enhancement of compensation. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42348 of 2019
Petitioner :- Bachchu Lal Gupta Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Ravi Nath Tilhari,J.
Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1, Sri Neeraj Dube, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 and the learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this writ petition, as he will move an appropriate application for enhancement of compensation before the authority concerned.
That being the case, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 19.12.2019 Pkb/
(Ravi Nath Tilhari, J.) (Abhinava Upadhya, J.)
Bachchu Lal Gupta
Union Of India
4 Others
Abhinava Upadhya
Ravi Nath Tilhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
