Amrita Devi v. State of U P and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41989 of 2019…
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41989 of 2019…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41989 of 2019
Petitioner :- Amrita Devi Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Ravi Nath Tilhari,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
The petitioner submits that he was covered by the Mukhya Mantri Kisan Evam Sarvhit Beema Yojna. The petitioner unfortunately died in an accident on 02.12.2017.
The petitioner claims insured amount but the Insurance Company has rejected the same holding that the petitioner's age as mentioned in her documentation is 72 years whereas in the post mortem, the age of the petitioner is shown as 54 years.
Under the scheme, there appears to be a Redressal Forum provided which is a District Level Committee headed by District Magistrate where such issues can be redressed.
In case, the petitioner moves an application before the District Magistrate, respondent no. 3, the claim of the petitioner be considered and appropriate orders be passed in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 19.12.2019 sweta
(Ravi Nath Tilhari,J.) (Abhinava Upadhya,J.)
Amrita Devi
State Of U P
2 Others
Abhinava Upadhya
Ravi Nath Tilhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court