Dismissed
Sandhya Singh v. State of U.P. and 29 Others
Allahabad HCWRIC/40395/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40395 of 2018…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40395 of 2018…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40395 of 2018
Petitioner :- Sandhya Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 29 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harihar Prasad Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amit Verma,Brij Bhushan Paul,Devi Prasad Mishra,Rajmani Yadav,Ajit Kumar Singh (Addl. Advocate General), Nimai Das & Sudhanshu Srivastava (Addl. C.S.C.), M.D.Singh 'Shekhar' (Senior Advocate)
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Virendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 31.10.2019 KA
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Prakati Rai and 6 others vs. State of U.p. and 20 OthersReferred¶6
Prakati Rai and 6 others vs. State of U.p. and 20 Others Writ-C No. 29495 of 2018
Sandhya Singh
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Virendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court