A short order wherein only the utmost brief conclusion yet stating that the appeal is allowed derives help from a separate leading Criminal Appeal decided simultaneously. No fresh reasonings are given.
See order in Criminal Appeal No. 5708 of 2017 for details.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 5986 of 2017
Appellant :- Jagmohan @ Munna Nishad And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Ajai Kumar,Phool Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Sudhir Bharti
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Virendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 2.8.2019 Vandana
Jagmohan @ Munna Nishad And Another
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Virendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
