The High Court dismissed the writ petition as misconceived because the writ petitioners were not parties to the impugned civil court judgment. The court held that non-parties cannot be directed to ensure compliance with a judgment to which they were not parties.
None. The writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36136 of 2019
Petitioner :- Hari Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Srivastava,Sushil Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 13.11.2019 Manish Himwan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued directing non-parties to a civil suit to comply with that judgment.
Hari Singh
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
