This petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner stated he no longer had instructions. The dismissal was left open pending revival. Section 28(1) of the Constitution was invoked implicitly as the instrument of dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3553 of 2004
Petitioner :- Vijay Bahadur Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepak Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,S.C.,V.V.Misra,Vivekanand Yadav
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he no longer has instructions. Accordingly while this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, it is left open to the petitioner to seek revival of the petition in case cause of action survives.
Order Date :- 26.9.2019 Vivek Kr.
Vijay Bahadur Singh
State Of U.P.
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
