form-23, the area of lot no. 38 is mentioned as 12–95. Below it, the area of no. 226 is written as 96 dismil. Before these, the number of total other plots is 29 measuring 11–02 acres. It appears that either it should be 9 in place of 38 or the area in place of 12-95 should be such that altogether comes to a total of 13-91. There appears to be some error in it. If the area of the Khatedaar has decreased on the basis of valuation due to consolidation procedure, he should be given its benefit. If the reduction in area is a result of determination of title, its benefit will not be extended to the Khatedaar. A copy of form-32 has been filed in case of Pejani Devi as well. In this respect, it is pertinent to see in which respect she has been included in the consolidation. Smt. Pejani Devi is mother of the Khatedar. If she is alive, the land under his name cannot be included in the name of the Khatedar unless it is proved that the land under the name of Pejani Devi is Benami. As far as any share of Pejani Devi in the land of Shirkhudkasht is concerned, it is worthy of note that only sons and their sons in Hindu religion whose births take place before abolition of Zamindari have share. Females do not have any right and share in it. In such a situation, there is no substance in the appeal filed by Pejani Devi.” (English Translation by Court)
