The court dismissed the writ petition directed against orders under the Payment of Wages Act, 1972. The judge found the employer's claim of non-management earlier to be false based on sworn statements and held no error existed in the impugned orders.
Writ petition dismissed; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32216 of 1995 Petitioner :- M/S Bonded Excise Ware House Varanasi Respondent :- Sharda And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.S. Nigam,Shakti Swarup Nigam,Swapnil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- SC
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
"That the petitioner has no concern with the management of running of the aforesaid ware house prior to the year 1994-95, i.e. effective from 1st April 1994 till 30th March 1995. Therefore, the petitioner is not liable for any cause of action arising before the said period."
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is a manifest error in the orders dated 25.03.1995 and 12.09.1995 passed under the Payment of Wages Act, 1972.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Bonded Excise Ware House Varanasi
Sharda And Others
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
