In a writ petition concerning unauthorized tube-well installation by a private party within the petitioner's proximity, the court held that the matter is a private dispute. It ruled that no writ jurisdiction exists, and the petitioner's remedy lies in filing a civil suit.
Writ petition dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34325 of 2019
Petitioner :- Latoori Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chakshuvendra Pachauri Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 23.10.2019 YK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition arising from a private dispute over tube-well installation is maintainable.
Whether an alternative remedy lies in common law via a civil suit.
Latoori Prasad
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
