Petitioner challenged illegal transfer of Waqf property and District Magistrate's inaction. Court held petitioner must approach Waqf Board under the Waqf Act, 1995 as the concerned authority. Writ petition dismissed on alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33981 of 2019
Petitioner :- Dinesh Prajapati Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ranjeet Asthana Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 22.10.2019 Manish Himwan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging alleged illegal transfer of Waqf property, where no action was taken by District Magistrate, should be allowed when a specific remedy exists under the Waqf Act, 199
Dinesh Prajapati
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
